RESEARKA

What does the current evidence establish about Ace Inhibitors Aging and human geroscience? This synthesis tests the thesis that evidence for ACE inhibitors aging is context-dependent, separating outcome-specific signals from broader claims and identifying the evidence gaps that should bound interpretation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are widely prescribed for hypertension, yet whether they confer direct anti-aging benefits—attenuating frailty, preserving muscle function, or extending lifespan beyond blood-pressure control—remains debated. This synthesis applied a structured, AI-assisted evidence-synthesis approach with an auditable trail to integrate 47 curated reference papers spanning randomized trials, observational cohorts, and preclinical mechanistic studies on ACE inhibitors and aging-related outcomes. Functional aging endpoints were similarly ambiguous: ACE inhibitor therapy did not improve gait-speed reserve beyond statin effects in older adults (Spiegeleer 2025), and in the LACE trial ACE I/D genotype associated with grip and quadriceps strength in sarcopenic men but ACE inhibitor treatment itself did not produce a significant strength response (Rossios 2023). Importantly, no direct human trial with aging-specific primary endpoints—such as frailty incidence, sarcopenia progression, or all-cause longevity in non-diseased older adults—was identified in this synthesis. The mechanistic plausibility that ACE inhibition modulates inflammation, e

Citation Support

• source_1 Lin 2026
• source_2 Din 2026
• source_3 Spiegeleer 2025
• source_4 Shen 2025
• source_5 Bene 2025